Home Consumer How is China’s influencer economy different from the UK’s?

How is China’s influencer economy different from the UK’s?

by Antoaneta Becker
0 comments

Influencer marketing in China is often the engine of sales; UK brands must adapt to thrive in its unique ecosystem

China’s social commerce space revolves not around ambient influencer posts, but an intricate ecosystem where content, commerce and credibility converge. British brands stepping into this arena must unlearn much of what they assume about sponsorship in the UK and embrace the layered roles of KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders), KOCs (Key Opinion Consumers) and KOSs (Key Opinion Sellers).

“China is a global leader in influencer marketing, with the market for key opinion leaders (KOLs) reaching billions of pounds worth of sales, a scale unmatched in the West,” says CBBC’s Director, Consumer Economy Antoaneta Becker. KOLs like Li Jiaqi the ‘lipstick king‘, regularly drive hyper‑growth via marathon livestreams. Becker reminds us that “big isn’t always better” — sometimes niche, mid-sized creators outperform giants on return on investment. KOCs —micro‑influencers with smaller but highly engaged followings — often play the most effective role in initial trust building. They provide authenticity, especially among Chinese consumers who tend to trust peer reviews more than polished celebrity endorsements.

Platform dynamics differ sharply, too. In the UK, an influencer post may raise awareness; purchases generally happen later, off‑platform. In China, platforms like Douyin (short video plus Mini Shops), Xiaohongshu (content-led discovery), Taobao Live (livestream‑driven sales) and WeChat mini‑programs link community, content and commerce in real time. A single livestream can sell out stock in minutes if logistical readiness, message alignment and platform strategy are in place.

launchpad gateway

The contrast is striking: whereas UK shoppers are comfortable with keyword search and independent product research, Chinese consumers rely on multiple touchpoints — sometimes eight or more — before buying, placing influencer-driven livestreams or lifestyle content at the centre of the journey.

This difference produces very real errors. UK brands can fall into the traps of misallocating budgets, chasing marquee KOLs without matching audiences or not ensuring inventory readiness. Some refused to adapt messaging or packaging after KOC-led feedback, and ultimately saw partnerships cancelled or campaign efficacy drop dramatically.

By contrast, successful brands use KOCs early to validate messaging and packaging through Influencer Focus Group or similar sessions. Once the story resonates, they scale via KOL livestream collaborations — yet always with careful alignment of inventory, platform mechanics and sales fulfilment. In a recent CBBC panel, Ntola Obazee of Emma Bridgewater explained that “live streaming in China now accounts for 10% of Emma Bridgewater’s sales, with live streamers often creating videos of the unboxing experience and doing live reviews of products” — demonstrating the power of co-created content paired with real-time conversion via influencer formats.

The benefits are compelling: livestream-led campaigns can produce dramatic sales spikes, micro‑influencers seed grassroots trust, and private‑domain marketing via WeChat mini‑programs or group chats fosters loyalty and repeat purchase. WeChat groups in China can be very effective if key opinion communities are pushing products through and mobilising with great content and brand support.

However, the influencer economy brings real risk. Fake followers and inflated engagement are widespread; studies suggest up to 45% of influencer metrics may be fabricated, often through Multi-Channel Network (MNC)-driven embellishment. High-profile scandals — such as livestreamer Viya’s abrupt ban for regulatory infractions — can trigger blackout-like disruptions and literary vanish entire campaign plans overnight.

Cost structures also diverge. In the UK, flat‑fee sponsorship is common; in China, KOL deals often involve commission-based remuneration (typically 10–30 %) or MCN-managed bundles. Brands must account not only for talent cost but stock readiness, logistics and contingency planning — missing stock at the moment of conversion can immediately undermine credibility.

To compete effectively, UK brands must recalibrate their strategy. They should engage micro‑influencers early, adapt assets and packaging via focus testing, co-design livestream programmes, plan inventory and logistics robustly, and use KOLs and KOCs in tandem to seed trust and scale. They must prepare to build community in WeChat private domains rather than assume platform checkout alone will convert UK-style posts into sales.

China’s influencer ecosystem demands theatre and trust anchored in real-time commerce. Brands that replicate a UK influencer playbook — isolated macro-influencer mentions or studio shoots — are unlikely to make an impact. Those that design a multi-tiered influencer strategy — seed with KOCs, amplify with KOL livestreams, convert on Douyin or Taobao, and retain via WeChat — stand to perform at a level far beyond UK norms.

UK brands engaging in China’s social commerce must treat influencer marketing less as sponsorship and more as an integrated sales channel, rooted in live content, platform-native formats, tight logistics and trust-led storytelling. Those that get the ecosystem right unlock not just sales spikes, but scalable, sustainable consumer journeys.

Join CBBC’s China Consumer 2025 to learn more about the social selling sector in China

Related Articles

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More